Market entry issue tree
This issue tree frames market entry as two necessary questions. First, is the market worth entering? Size, growth, and margins describe the opportunity. Second, can the company win? That requires capabilities, a credible advantage, and a route to customers. Keeping these branches separate prevents an attractive market from being mistaken for an attractive company opportunity. The tree can be expanded with regulation, investment, and risk once the core questions are clear. Each leaf should become a research task with evidence and a decision criterion, not a generic discussion topic. It gives readers a concise reference they can reuse when discussing the result with colleagues.
Open it in the AI editor with a prompt pre-filled — keep what works, change what doesn't.
Scenario
Market entry framing
Key decisions
- Attractiveness: Test market size, growth, and margins.
- Ability to win: Test differentiation and route to market.
- Decision rule: Enter only if both branches support it.
When to reuse this
Use to scope a market-entry study or an investment committee discussion.
Frequently asked questions
Why separate attractiveness and ability to win?
Can regulation be added?
What belongs at the leaves?
More strategy examples
Try the diagram makers.
Tweak it with chat, export PNG/SVG, or fork it for your own use case.