Office Location Decision Matrix

This decision matrix compares three possible office locations with four criteria. Commute access and client access measure convenience, annual rent represents the cost tradeoff, and room to grow looks beyond the first lease term. Each option is scored on the same scale, and the weights indicate which factors matter most to the company. The matrix makes the decision assumptions visible and provides a useful starting point for a facilities discussion. It does not include every lease concern. Add security, accessibility, fit-out cost, network availability, parking, and local rules when they matter. Scores should be based on current facts, and the team should agree on what a high score means before reviewing the result.

Tipo Grafico comparativoStandard Pugh, Total Design (1991)Motore schematex-comparisonAggiornato 24/09/2026

La richiesta

“A weighted decision matrix for choosing among a city-centre office, a rail-district office, and a suburban campus, comparing commute access, annual rent, client access, and room to grow.”

Prova alloraAdd a criterion for parkingChange annual rent weight to 5

Cosa contiene questo disegno

Leggi le decisioni che ne stanno alla base.

01Access

Weight staff and client access separately where both matter.

02Cost

Score annual rent as a favorable lower-cost option.

03Growth

Include future space capacity.

04Evidence

Refresh scores with current lease and transport information.

Use this matrix to focus a site-selection discussion before lease negotiation and due diligence.

Sfoglia tutti i modelli di tipo grafico comparativo →

FAQ

Domande frequenti

Why weight commute access highly?

It can materially affect staff convenience and recruitment, but each company should set its own priority.

What does a high rent score mean?

In this example, it means a more favorable annual rent.

Can I add lease risk?

Yes. Add a criterion and score each location with the same definition.