INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Patent family with regional filings

This patent family tree follows a UK priority filing through an international PCT application. The PCT branches to a granted European patent with German and French validations, pending US and Korean national phases, and a granted Australian application. Showing regional and country-level rights under their procedural parent makes a coverage discussion easier to follow. It also exposes where status differs among jurisdictions. A tree is an overview, not a legal register: renewal status, opposition, validation requirements and claim scope need separate verification. Use it to organize a portfolio discussion before consulting authoritative records. Keep each country label tied to the underlying application or validation, rather than implying a single worldwide patent right.

UPDATED 2026-09-24
EXAMPLEPatent family with regional filings
Make this diagram your own.

Open it in the AI editor with a prompt pre-filled — keep what works, change what doesn't.

CASE ANALYSIS

Scenario

Regional filing status review

Key decisions

  • Priority route: Start with the national priority filing.
  • Regional branch: Keep EP validation countries under the European patent.
  • Status labels: Separate pending applications from granted rights.

When to reuse this

Use this to summarize geographic coverage in a cross-border patent portfolio.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is an EP validation?01
It is the step that gives effect to a granted European patent in a designated state, subject to local rules.
Can one PCT application enter many countries?02
Yes. The applicant can pursue national or regional phases in selected jurisdictions.
Does a grant in one country mean a grant everywhere?03
No. Each national or regional branch has its own prosecution and legal status.
Open this example in the editor →

Tweak it with chat, export PNG/SVG, or fork it for your own use case.