Payment Integration Package Diagram

Payment integration package diagram

A payment integration package diagram separates the checkout experience from payment orchestration and the external gateway. It also makes the asynchronous webhook path visible, which is important because a payment result may arrive after the original request. A ledger package records the business outcome without exposing its details to the checkout package. Use this diagram in an implementation review to check that provider-specific code stays behind an adapter and that callback handling has an explicit place.

유형 UML 클래스 다이어그램표준 OMG UML 2.5.1 §9–§11엔진 schematex-umlclass업데이트됨 2026. 9. 24.

요청 내용

“Create a payment integration package diagram with checkout, payments, gateway, webhooks, and ledger packages and their dependencies.”

그렇다면Add a refunds package.Change GatewayAdapter to AdyenAdapter.

이 도면에 담긴 내용

그 이면의 의사결정을 읽어 보세요.

01Separate orchestration

Checkout requests payment without owning gateway details.

02Contain the provider

Keep gateway calls inside an adapter package.

03Handle callbacks

Treat webhooks as a distinct inbound boundary.

04Record outcomes

Update the ledger from verified payment events.

Use to review responsibilities and dependencies before implementing payment flows.

모든 UML 클래스 다이어그램 템플릿 보기 →

자주 묻는 질문

Why isolate the gateway adapter?

It keeps provider-specific requests and responses from spreading across the application.

Why show webhooks separately?

They are an inbound asynchronous flow with different verification and retry concerns.

Is this a sequence diagram?

No. It shows module dependencies, not the step-by-step timing of a payment.