情境
A hiring manager comparing finalists for a senior engineering role, needing to explain the trade-offs visually in a calibration session.
這張圖裡有什麼
看懂背後的決策。
01
Six axes are the critical engineering dimensions, scored identically so the shapes are directly comparable.
02
Three overlapping polygons use transparency so overlap regions are readable.
03Max 10 per axis keeps the scale intuitive
no normalization gymnastics for the reader.
Use for any multi-criteria comparison where shape (balance vs peak-and-valley) matters as much as absolute scores: vendor evaluation, product feature parity, team skill mapping.