ChatDiagram
Prova gratis
business · procurement

Cedar Suppliers — Cost and Quality

Cedar's procurement team compares unit cost against incoming quality across four suppliers. Aster has the highest quality score but is not the least expensive. Birch offers a lower cost with solid quality, while Delta needs attention because its quality score is lower. The chart helps the team frame a price-quality trade-off before reviewing capacity, lead time and contractual risk. It should not be used as a sole supplier scorecard: key measures such as delivery reliability belong in the accompanying review. Equal bubbles keep this example focused on the two explicit axes and readable at card size.

Tipo Grafico a dispersioneMotore echarts-scatterAggiornato 24/09/2026
Cedar: Supplier Cost and Quality
Drawing preview
La richiesta

“Create a bubble chart titled Cedar Suppliers: Cost and Quality. Use unit cost in dollars on the x-axis and quality score on the y-axis. Label Aster at 22, 97; Birch at 16, 89; Canyon at 27, 94; and Delta at 19, 78. Use equal bubbles to compare suppliers.”

Prova alloraAdd Elm at 24 dollars and a quality score of 92.Change the quality-axis minimum to 60.
Cosa contiene questo disegno

Leggi le decisioni che ne stanno alla base.

01Use a consistent quality score

Make suppliers comparable.

02Show cost on the x-axis

Identify price-quality trade-offs.

03Label every supplier

Support contract discussion.

Use this chart for a short supplier list with stable quality measurements.

Sfoglia tutti i modelli di tipo grafico a dispersione →

FAQ

Domande frequenti

What should the quality score measure?

Use a consistent inspection or defect-based score for all suppliers.

Is the cheapest supplier best?

Not automatically; quality, reliability and risk also matter.

Can volume be bubble size?

Yes, if purchase volume is an important third measure.