Cedar Supplier Bubble Chart

Cedar Suppliers — Cost and Quality

Cedar's procurement team compares unit cost against incoming quality across four suppliers. Aster has the highest quality score but is not the least expensive. Birch offers a lower cost with solid quality, while Delta needs attention because its quality score is lower. The chart helps the team frame a price-quality trade-off before reviewing capacity, lead time and contractual risk. It should not be used as a sole supplier scorecard: key measures such as delivery reliability belong in the accompanying review. Equal bubbles keep this example focused on the two explicit axes and readable at card size.

種類 散布図エンジン echarts-scatter更新日 2026/9/24

依頼内容

“Create a bubble chart titled Cedar Suppliers: Cost and Quality. Use unit cost in dollars on the x-axis and quality score on the y-axis. Label Aster at 22, 97; Birch at 16, 89; Canyon at 27, 94; and Delta at 19, 78. Use equal bubbles to compare suppliers.”

次はこちらAdd Elm at 24 dollars and a quality score of 92.Change the quality-axis minimum to 60.

この図に含まれるもの

図の背後にある意思決定を読み解く。

01Use a consistent quality score

Make suppliers comparable.

02Show cost on the x-axis

Identify price-quality trade-offs.

03Label every supplier

Support contract discussion.

Use this chart for a short supplier list with stable quality measurements.

散布図のテンプレートをすべて見る →

よくある質問

What should the quality score measure?

Use a consistent inspection or defect-based score for all suppliers.

Is the cheapest supplier best?

Not automatically; quality, reliability and risk also matter.

Can volume be bubble size?

Yes, if purchase volume is an important third measure.