“Draw a purchase approval workflow where requests under $500 go to manager review, $500 to $5,000 go to director review then manager review, and requests over $5,000 go to VP review, CFO sign-off, and manager review; each decision can reject, and manager approval generates a purchase order.”
그 이면의 의사결정을 읽어 보세요.
The first decision sends requests under $500, from $500 to $5,000, and over $5,000 to different approval paths.
Mid-tier requests require director review; high-tier requests require VP review followed by CFO sign-off.
Every approved path reaches manager review before a purchase order is generated.
Director, VP, CFO, and manager review each have approved and rejected outcomes.
All rejected requests end at one clearly labeled rejection terminal.
Use this workflow for a simple purchase-approval policy with the shown thresholds. Align thresholds, delegated authority, budget checks, and exception handling with the organization’s actual policy.
이 유형의 다른 예시
자주 묻는 질문
Why does every approved path go to the manager?
The diagram makes manager approval the final control that authorizes purchase-order generation.
What happens when a director, VP, or CFO rejects a request?
Each rejected branch ends at the same Request Rejected terminal.
Why is there a manager decision after manager review?
It makes the manager’s approved and rejected outcomes explicit instead of implying that every review automatically approves.
Does the flow include budget validation?
No. Add a budget-check decision before routing if the organization requires available-funds verification.