Chemical release barriers
This bowtie uses loss of containment as the central control point for a chemical storage scenario. The threat side separates equipment degradation from transfer errors and makes the barriers for each visible. The consequence side distinguishes possible harm to people from environmental release, with response and containment measures on each path. It is a useful starting point for a process-safety discussion because it asks what must work before and after a release. Add site-specific equipment, operating limits, barrier owners and assurance activities before using it in a formal risk assessment. The example is qualitative and does not provide a probability calculation or replace hazardous-area, process-design or emergency-planning requirements.
Open it in the AI editor with a prompt pre-filled — keep what works, change what doesn't.
Scenario
Chemical storage review
Key decisions
- Hazard: Name the stored material and system.
- Top event: Use loss of containment.
- Prevention: Cover integrity and transfer controls.
- Recovery: Include people and environmental consequences.
When to reuse this
Use for a qualitative process-safety workshop before detailed engineering review.
Frequently asked questions
What is loss of containment?
What are preventative barriers?
Can assurance activities be shown?
Tweak it with chat, export PNG/SVG, or fork it for your own use case.