PROCESS SAFETY

Chemical release barriers

This bowtie uses loss of containment as the central control point for a chemical storage scenario. The threat side separates equipment degradation from transfer errors and makes the barriers for each visible. The consequence side distinguishes possible harm to people from environmental release, with response and containment measures on each path. It is a useful starting point for a process-safety discussion because it asks what must work before and after a release. Add site-specific equipment, operating limits, barrier owners and assurance activities before using it in a formal risk assessment. The example is qualitative and does not provide a probability calculation or replace hazardous-area, process-design or emergency-planning requirements.

UPDATED 2026-09-24
TYPEBowtie
EXAMPLEChemical release barriers
Make this diagram your own.

Open it in the AI editor with a prompt pre-filled — keep what works, change what doesn't.

CASE ANALYSIS

Scenario

Chemical storage review

Key decisions

  • Hazard: Name the stored material and system.
  • Top event: Use loss of containment.
  • Prevention: Cover integrity and transfer controls.
  • Recovery: Include people and environmental consequences.

When to reuse this

Use for a qualitative process-safety workshop before detailed engineering review.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is loss of containment?01
It is the unintended release of a contained chemical from its intended system.
What are preventative barriers?02
They are controls intended to stop a threat from causing the top event.
Can assurance activities be shown?03
Yes. Inspection and testing can be added as barriers or as controls against barrier degradation.
Open this example in the editor →

Tweak it with chat, export PNG/SVG, or fork it for your own use case.