Treatment Outcomes Mosaic Plot
This chart compares outcome categories for two rehabilitation programs. It makes the relative distribution of improved, unchanged, and worsened outcomes visible without relying on raw counts alone. The guided program has a larger improved share and a smaller worsened share in this example. That difference may guide a follow-up review, but it does not prove the program caused the result. Confirm eligibility rules, baseline severity, follow-up timing, and sample sizes before drawing a clinical conclusion. In a report, pair this view with the actual number of participants and a description of how the outcome categories were defined. Review the underlying definitions and totals before using this view to make an operational decision.
Open it in the AI editor with a prompt pre-filled — keep what works, change what doesn't.
Scenario
Program outcome review
Key decisions
- Compare outcome mix: Assess the difference in improvement rates.
- Check study design: Confirm groups are comparable before inferring cause.
- Review safety: Examine every worsened outcome.
When to reuse this
Use for categorical outcomes from clearly defined comparison groups.
Frequently asked questions
Why use percentages here?
Does this prove one program works better?
What should be defined first?
More healthcare examples
Try the diagram makers.
Tweak it with chat, export PNG/SVG, or fork it for your own use case.