Treatment Outcomes Mosaic Plot

This chart compares outcome categories for two rehabilitation programs. It makes the relative distribution of improved, unchanged, and worsened outcomes visible without relying on raw counts alone. The guided program has a larger improved share and a smaller worsened share in this example. That difference may guide a follow-up review, but it does not prove the program caused the result. Confirm eligibility rules, baseline severity, follow-up timing, and sample sizes before drawing a clinical conclusion. In a report, pair this view with the actual number of participants and a description of how the outcome categories were defined. Review the underlying definitions and totals before using this view to make an operational decision.

Tipo Gráfico de barrasMecanismo echarts-barAtualizado 24/09/2026

A solicitação

“Create a mosaic plot comparing rehabilitation outcomes for a standard program and a guided program: standard improved 54%, no change 34%, worsened 12%; guided improved 68%, no change 25%, worsened 7%.”

Depois, tenteAdd sample sizes of 96 and 102 to the subtitle.Rename Improved to Clinically improved.

O que há neste desenho

Entenda as decisões por trás dele.

01Compare outcome mix

Assess the difference in improvement rates.

02Check study design

Confirm groups are comparable before inferring cause.

03Review safety

Examine every worsened outcome.

Use for categorical outcomes from clearly defined comparison groups.

Ver todos os modelos de gráfico de barras →

Perguntas frequentes

Dúvidas comuns

Why use percentages here?

They allow category mixes to be compared when program groups have different sizes.

Does this prove one program works better?

No. It is descriptive; study design and uncertainty need separate review.

What should be defined first?

Define the outcome categories and follow-up window consistently for both groups.