HEALTHCARE

Treatment Outcomes Mosaic Plot

This chart compares outcome categories for two rehabilitation programs. It makes the relative distribution of improved, unchanged, and worsened outcomes visible without relying on raw counts alone. The guided program has a larger improved share and a smaller worsened share in this example. That difference may guide a follow-up review, but it does not prove the program caused the result. Confirm eligibility rules, baseline severity, follow-up timing, and sample sizes before drawing a clinical conclusion. In a report, pair this view with the actual number of participants and a description of how the outcome categories were defined. Review the underlying definitions and totals before using this view to make an operational decision.

UPDATED 2026-09-25
TYPEBar
EXAMPLETreatment Outcomes Mosaic Plot
Make this diagram your own.

Open it in the AI editor with a prompt pre-filled — keep what works, change what doesn't.

CASE ANALYSIS

Scenario

Program outcome review

Key decisions

  • Compare outcome mix: Assess the difference in improvement rates.
  • Check study design: Confirm groups are comparable before inferring cause.
  • Review safety: Examine every worsened outcome.

When to reuse this

Use for categorical outcomes from clearly defined comparison groups.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Why use percentages here?01
They allow category mixes to be compared when program groups have different sizes.
Does this prove one program works better?02
No. It is descriptive; study design and uncertainty need separate review.
What should be defined first?03
Define the outcome categories and follow-up window consistently for both groups.
Open this example in the editor →

Tweak it with chat, export PNG/SVG, or fork it for your own use case.